-
About
- About Us
- Our Vision, Mission, Goals and Strategy
- Our Board of Directors
- The Importance of Emergency Care
- Emergency Medicine Facts
- Why IFEM is needed
- IFEM Assembly
-
IFEM Awards IFEM Awards
- About IFEM awards
- Gautam Bodiwala Lifetime Leadership Achievement Award
- George Podgorny Lecturers
- Order of the International Federation of Emergency Medicine
- Humanitarian Award
- Visionary Industry Technology Award (VITA)
- VITA Award Recipients 2025
- ICEM 2025 Research Excellence Awards
- ICEM 2025 Research Award Winners
- Our Governance
- Our History
- Statement on Protection of Health Workers and Facilities in Areas of War and Conflict
- Position Statement on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
- Contact us
-
Our work
- Global Campaign Against ED Over-Crowding
- Advocacy
- Emergency Medical Care Worker Wellbeing
-
Committees Committees
- About our Committees
-
Emergency Medicine Practice Committee Emergency Medicine Practice Committee
-
Academic Committee Academic Committee
-
Emergency Medicine Development Committee Emergency Medicine Development Committee
-
Finance, Governance and Risk Committee Finance, Governance and Risk Committee
-
ICEM Committee ICEM Committee
-
Groups Groups
- About Groups
-
Events and CPD Group Events and CPD Group
-
Research Group Research Group
-
Education Practice Group Education Practice Group
-
Membership Group Membership Group
-
Regional Forum Group Regional Forum Group
-
Policy Group Policy Group
-
Special Interest Groups Special Interest Groups
- About Special Interest Groups
-
Behavioral Emergencies SIG Behavioral Emergencies SIG
-
Critical Care in Emergency Medicine SIG Critical Care in Emergency Medicine SIG
-
Disaster Medicine SIG Disaster Medicine SIG
-
EM Resident Trainee Special Interest Group EM Resident Trainee Special Interest Group
-
Emergency Ultrasound SIG Emergency Ultrasound SIG
-
Gender Specific Issues SIG Gender Specific Issues SIG
-
Geriatric Emergency Medicine SIG Geriatric Emergency Medicine SIG
-
Informatics Special Interest Group Informatics Special Interest Group
-
Technology SIG Technology SIG
-
Paediatric Emergency Medicine SIG Paediatric Emergency Medicine SIG
-
Public and Environmental Health SIG Public and Environmental Health SIG
-
Quality and Safety SIG Quality and Safety SIG
-
Trauma SIG Trauma SIG
-
Taskforces Taskforces
- About our Taskforces
-
Portuguese Translation Taskforce Portuguese Translation Taskforce
-
Spanish Translation Taskforce Spanish Translation Taskforce
-
Acute Care Action Network Taskforce Acute Care Action Network Taskforce
-
Resources
-
Research
-
Education
-
Events
-
International Conference on Emergency Medicine International Conference on Emergency Medicine
- Event Calendar
- Event endorsement
- Symposia collaboration
- Apply for Sponsored Access to IFEM Events
-
-
News
End-of-Life Care Across the Spectrum of Life
At the International Conference on Emergency Medicine held in Amsterdam, two groups that don’t often overlap came together.
Dr. Nemat Alsaba from the Geriatric EM Special Interest Group and Dr. Simon Chu from the Pediatric EM Special Interest Group pulled together a 90-minute session that took most of the large audience by surprise in discovering how similar are the issues in providing end-of-life care in the ED between the very young and the very old – whether unexpected sudden death or extended pre-death care.
Two or three members from each SIG presented challenging cases from their own experience – the healthy 3-week-old with the sudden collapse; the robust 92-year-old with the sudden collapse; and others. They discussed how they had managed them clinically and reflected on the many other challenges the cases presented – communications, ethics, medico-legal considerations.
After we heard about five cases, Drs. Colin Powell and Don Melady moderated a panel discussion* to explore the similarities and differences across the life spectrum through the lens of bioethical considerations. We discovered that there were far more similarities than differences!
Common themes that arose in both age groups:
- The challenges around addressing the ethical imperative of autonomy when dealing with patients are not able to express themselves and their own wishes;
- The challenges of address beneficence – when there are occasionally differing definitions of what “doing good” means for the different parties.
- The challenges of addressing non-maleficence when “doing bad” (e.g. permitting natural death) may actually be in the best interest of the patient;
- The challenges of addressing justice especially social justice where in systems with limited resources, “doing everything” for one patient may mean that other patients get less;
- The importance of involving family and other caregivers in decision-making, as challenging as that may be;
- The importance of clear communication from the clinical team including excellent listening skills.
Don Melady, Canada


